Help us improve Answers HQ! Take Survey No, Thanks. Sign In or Register. See details Show less. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. Unfair Ultimate team matchmaking. Unfair Ultimate team matchmaking by Synbois Zombies Games Plants vs. Tapped Out The Simpsons: September - last edited September I am playing fifa Ult team 16 on xbox one and want to play a 1. Message 1 of 3 1, Views. September its always been broken in fifa. Message 2 of 3 1, Views. Oct 27, 2, Oct 25, 1, Big publishers and studios continue their descent into being casinos that people are willing to go to bat for.
Re: Unfair Ultimate team matchmaking
Nov 3, 6, For reference, the original video that Jim was talking about is this one from YongYea. Oct 25, 4, Congratulations, EA, you finally got there. Nov 20, Playing single player only these days is a fucking blessing honestly. I'm so done with Online multiplayer and have been for years. Even then we still have to put up with Lootboxes sneaking in to SP. Oct 30, This is fucking gross Oct 28, Sorry Burnout, can't and won't buy ya Oct 27, Barnsley, UK. Can't even get angry about this shit anymore.
I just watch these videos and think "yeah that sounds like something EA would do. I will continue to not buy any EA games. Dec 23, People often called me Nintendo Fanboy in the past on other websites because I mainly buy, play and support Nintendo games. But things like this is the reason I'm also doing this, i just don't know which company I can trust anymore, and i don't want to support companys who build such practices in their games.
And it's getting worse year over year! Nintendo is for me just the one company which does not implement such practices in their games, and i want to support that. I also have the feeling that Nintendo gives more than they take, i meant there were alot of free updates for Splatoon 2, Arms, and Fire Emblem for instance.
- 13 hilarious and sexist dating tips 1938.
- i dont trust the guy im dating?
- how to act when first dating a guy.
- FIFA 18 FUT Champions Tips.
- beckham dating;
- marriage not dating ep 12 eng?
If it means that I'm a Nintendo Fanboy when i support a company that i like because of their practices, than I'm a Nintendo Fanboy and I'm proud if it: Oct 26, Is there a source for the FIFA 'handicap' thing? I have been suspect of this for a while now, but I am now just putting it down to low morale. Oct 28, 1, Still, as a bandaid, it's not as outrageous as it would seem at first.
Again, if you are losing, you should be matched against worse players. The one bit about pairing players against other players that have a buyable item they may want is absolute, classic, pure EA evil, though. Oct 27, Oct 28, 3, Belgium. EA is becoming more and more a cancer of the games industry.
Fut 14 Unfair Matchmaking | ВКонтакте
And yet people keep buying their games Oct 25, I am very interested in this FIFA scripting thing. Is there any evidence that this exists that can't be attributed to some other phenomenon?
- free dating sites huntsville al!
- date hookup nashville.
- speed dating south tyneside!
- make your hookup fall for you.
- The matchmaking is useless - FIFA Mobile News & Discussion - FUT Talk - Futhead;
- FIFA 18 FUT Champions Tips.
- london hook up clubs.
- Original Post;
- cheerleader dating site.
- 20 dating 28 year old.
- zipcar dating.
I kind of wonder if this will really have the intended effect though? I feel like a lot of enthusiasts would choose to simply not play games that tip the scales and matchmake you in with MTX purchasers purposely. However, If EA stacked the deck in Titanfall 3 though for those who purchase MTX, and the matchmaking forces me to compete against those people I just I have to imagine that a lot of people would make a similar choice, which could result in lost software sales.
It seems risky to try to cannibalize and alienate some of your initial software purchasers in the hopes of getting a more dedicated and niche audience of MTX customers. The progression levels themselves are a mechanic to ensure player retention in two ways: If you accept false sense of accomplishment as a way to boost player retention in CoD, for instance, why not additionally by clever matchmaking? In fact, if it were applied without the grindy progression mechanics in place as well, it would increase the amount of interesting challenges a good player would face very quickly.
Oct 25, 7, Oct 25, 5, Oct 30, https: Imagine if these types of things were suggested in actual sports! If, for example, in a Junior soccer league, a team that lost often would be matched only against losing teams to help boost their winning stats instead of respecting an even schedule for all teams? There would be outrage! That's something that has always annoyed, as just think about it, you pick a team that you think is great Real Madrid for example and boom, a factor totally outside your control is added in morale and your team is crap, all because of a factor you can't change or influence.
I'm pretty sure high profile games are already doing this but unfortunately there is not much we can do to stop it. First of all, it is very difficult to prove it since we are talking about thousands if not millions of matches and proprietary algorithms. Second of all, the majority of people will just keep playing even if there is a vocal minority that is boycotting such practices. The real problem is that multiplayer games are just fun, so for the vast majority of people it is very difficult to boycott them completely.
Jim Sterling: EA Proposes Unfair Matchmaking To Raise 'Player Engagement' & Monetization
Oct 27, 3, Nov 14, So, I just watched Jim's new video My biggest take away from it all is the quote about a future where we are in the hands of EA if we win or not. All of a sudden those scripted FIFA matches come back to my mind. Makes me wonder what systems like that Activision has in CoD. Also really funny how he says about it all sounds so conspiracy theory nuts, but we see them actually crowing about it all in papers for investors. Overall an excellent video. I actually watched this video yesterday and honestly this doesn't strike me as a very big deal.
I get that we are in this mindset of looking for every angle that publishers are out to screw us, but I'm really scratching my head on this one. This strikes me as a pretty common sense idea to alleviate player frustration. You solicit player feedback, find that when players kept losing repeatedly they were more prone to stop playing, and try to come up with ways that they might have more fun.
But it also seems like a way to correct possible issues in their matchmaking algorithm in general. Like we've got you at Rank X. You just lost five games in a row. All things equal it's not impossible that you would just lose five games in a row against the opponents you should be playing against based on your skill.
But what if you're really not Rank X material. Maybe it's time to test your skills against lower ranked players and make sure you aren't ranked too high.
Likewise, if you're on a win streak perhaps it's time to test your mettle against some higher ranked players. This really seems like a pretty lousy video to me. He rants about game designers using technical language to describe player engagement goals like it's something inherently nefarious. This isn't top secret information he's unearthed.
They're just technical papers that aren't written for public consumption.